Different schools deal with their gifted children in different ways: Some ignore them. Most acknowledge they do not have the resources to effectively educate their gifted children but they are willing to try. In New Zealand we have yet to put into place a national system that permits schools to identify their gifted children! Read about definitions of "giftedness" here... "Talented" and "gifted" - what's the difference? There is plenty of evidence that gifted children should be differentially treated, either by acceleration, enrichment, or ability grouping. But how you decide to define giftedness will influence how you later identify gifted children. Is there any real difference between being "talented" and being truly "gifted"? Some schools consider the top 15%, 10% or 5% of their students to be gifted or talented. Does research support the lumping together of these groups? Children in the top 3 percent of the population have atypical developmental patterns and require differentiated instruction. Children in the top 10 percent of the population are not statistically or developmentally different from children in the top 15 percent, and it is not justifiable to single them out for special treatment. It is similar to the situation where the moderately intellectually impaired, highly intellectually impaired and profoundly intellectually impaired all have quite different challenges and associated needs. So it is with the moderately gifted, highly gifted and profoundly gifted. They should not be lumped together.
Some teachers assume a gifted child will be "immature" or have some other deficit to "balance" out the areas he/she is talented in. Not all people work like that...some are frustratingly good at lots of things and may make some of us feel inadequate or threatened...after all, isn't the teacher supposed to be the source of all knowledge? We must not assume we know best just because we are adults or teachers. On the other hand, if a school decides to offer professional development to staff, and bring in a paid outside expert, don't forget that some staff may already have excellent experience in this area and can offer guidance for free. Be aware that some "expert" advice is of poor quality or too simplistic. Some "qualified" advisors (they have completed courses and/or papers) simply regurgitate theory or stereotype children. Avoid these people if you can! Parents/care-givers: Will be able to highlight problems the child has with the level the class is working at and relationships with other students. Particular strengths and learning difficulties can be identified from observations at home. Favourite past-times and topics can be recorded for use in developing an individual programme for the student. Likely career interests, academic or recreational interests may be justification for setting particular learning objectives or achievement goals and methods of learning. Goals may include developing practical skills (eg, the arts or sport) or academic exam based courses (eg, languages, history, science). Educational Psychologists/Academics: May highlight problems the child is likely to face in the near future and suggest particular strategies to avoid or cope with these. The advantages and disadvantages of particular methods of learning or assessment may be discussed. Professional develoment for staff may be available. The community: Schools may wish to be part of a city-wide or regional programme and share expertise and resources with each other. Organisations such as the Nexus Research Group, various Colleges of Education, the Association of Gifted Children, etc may be able to offer assistance in implementing programmes in your school.
Getting the balance right is a matter of trial and error for most parents and the school. At the heart of all our efforts must be the well-being of the child. Teachers, the Principal and parents may have different ideas of what is best for the gifted student. Who is right? Who will know best? A good school will treat each child as an individual and create a balanced programme that caters for:
If a parent perceives that a school cannot "get it right" for their child the family may decide to withdraw their child from the State system and teach them at home (parents: you must apply for an exemption from the Ministry of Education). A common myth among teachers is that it is bad to let a gifted child "move up" a year level and be in a class with children a year or two older. There is a belief that the gifted student is better off staying with children the same age as them, as if it is "normal" for people to seek out others of the same age. This is not true since in society it is "normal" for us to live, play and work with others of various ages. What should be the deciding factor is how the student responds to classmates and the level of work. Parents can let the school know how the child has responded from behaviour and comments at home. Partnerships with other schools or organisations may benefit your school (and student) in many ways:
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||