
Definitions of "Giftedness"
|

|
"All individuals have strengths
relative to their other capabilities; some individuals
have exceptional abilities relative to most other people..."
Working
Party Report, Nov 2001
|
A gifted or talented student stands out from
everyone else in the above definition ... perhaps in one area,
sometimes in many.
Gifted children have been defined as those "who
by nature of outstanding abilities are capable of high performance".
The term "outstanding abilities" refers to general intellectual
ability, specific academic aptitude, leadership ability, ability
in the visual or performing arts, creative thinking, or athletic
ability.
How do others define being "gifted"?
|
|
|
|
Some groups link giftedness with IQ - a measure of intelligence.
Those people with a high IQ are "gifted", everyone
else is not. But there a different types of IQ tests and
the "magic number" to reach to be called "gifted"
depends on the test used.
In general, since IQ tests assume that the inteligence
quotient values for any given population is based on a
normal distribution (bell-shaped curve), a person operating
at 2 or 3 standard deviations above the mean can be considered
gifted.
|
Some schools consider the top 15%, 10% or
5% of their students to be gifted or talented.
See NOTE
below.
|
|
BUT IQ tests are not appropriate for very young
children and can fail intelligent children who have limited
experiences of the world.
|
BUT this definition does not pick up those under-achieving
students who are bored by a subject or do not see it as
important and can pass with very little effort.
|
Modern norms for IQ
tests are biased against gifted children. Because of
their low ceilings, none of the current tests provides valid
IQ scores for highly gifted children.
Gifted children's
IQ scores become depressed at approximately 9 years of age due
to ceiling effects of the test. The ideal age for testing is
between 4 and 8.
There has been a trend away from defining the
gifted and talented in terms of a single category (for example,
high IQ) towards a multicategory approach, which acknowledges
a diverse range of special abilities.
|
NOTE:
There is plenty of evidence that gifted children should
be differentially treated, either by acceleration, enrichment,
or ability grouping. But how you decide to define giftedness
will influence how you later identify gifted
children. So far we have not differentiated between being
"talented" and being truly "gifted".
Does research support the lumping together of these groups?
Children in the top 3 percent of the population
have atypical developmental patterns and require differentiated
instruction. Children in the top 10 percent of the population
are not statistically or developmentally different from
children in the top 15 percent, and it is not justifiable
to single them out for special treatment.
It is similar to the
situation where the moderately intellectually impaired,
highly intellectually impaired and profoundly intellectually
impaired all have quite different challenges and associated
needs. So it is with the moderately gifted, highly gifted
and profoundly gifted. They
should not be lumped together.
|
Where to next?
So you think you finally know what the term "gifted"
or "talented" means...you might stick to the narrow
definitions above or have a wider view that includes artistic,
creative or leadership abilities.
How many of your children or students fit that
definition? And it is no good simply priding yourself on your
detective skills...what are you going to do about helping these
individuals?